[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed statement wrt GNU FDL

On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 02:14, Branden Robinson wrote:

> Another good argument against the GNU FDL.

Not to mention that publishing known false statements, like claiming it
is a GNU Manual or that the FSF publishes copies, is of dubious

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: