Re: LPPL and non-discrimination
Glenn Maynard <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 07:34:21PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
>> >> Must modifications be under the ABC-DFL? If so, it's non-free
>> >> because to modify it you must agree that ABC can use your code in
>> >> their proprietary stuff. Is this what you're getting at?
> What about a license like the GPL, without the source distribution requirement?
How is this different from a MIT/BSD license? The license is free,
but as distributed (e.g., w/o source) it may not be.
Jeremy Hankins <email@example.com>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03