On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 21:28, Michael D. Crawford wrote: > But what if it isn't? Must we only have the black-and-white distinction that > invariant sections or cover texts are never allowed, or could we allow them if > they are truthful? The cause is the non-freeness; one symptom of the non-freeness is that inaccurate information must be preserved. Fixing the symptom doesn't cure the cause. Besides, I don't think -legal or the ftp masters want to become the Truth Police.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part