Re: Question on wxWindows packages
--- Adam Warner <firstname.lastname@example.org> escribió: > Hi Roberto Sanchez,
> Roberto, this is a standard permissive MIT/BSD-style licence that has no
> advertising clause and is GPL compatible. The ambiguity in the "without
> fee" section is frequently misinterpreted (it means you can do everything
> listed without payment of any fee to the licensor). For this reason it's
> best left as an historical licence and not used for new software projects.
> The OSI calls it the "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer":
> The GPL-incompatible BSD advertising clause is different from a copyright
> notice appearing in the supporting documentation. You can read about the
> advertising clause here: <http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html>.
> Welcome to Debian.
Thanks for the info. Those links provided some good reading.
Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS
Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más...