On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 06:59:45PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> One which isn't mentioned there is to amend the DFSG to allow the FDL and
> similar licences.
>
> Before someone schedules a MOAB test over my home, note that I am not
> advocating this course, merely that it should be mentioned and refuted. If
> we don't do this, someone, somewhere is going to make the jump, and proceed
> to pester the Project to death with questions about why we don't just modify
> "that pesky ol' DFSG" and solve the problem that way.
I think "Why are Unmodifiable Sections a Problem?" in the proposed FAQ I just
posted in reply to Richard's message covers this. Could you have a look at it
to see if you agree?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Attachment:
pgpQoSUDfgjNY.pgp
Description: PGP signature