On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 06:59:45PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > One which isn't mentioned there is to amend the DFSG to allow the FDL and > similar licences. > > Before someone schedules a MOAB test over my home, note that I am not > advocating this course, merely that it should be mentioned and refuted. If > we don't do this, someone, somewhere is going to make the jump, and proceed > to pester the Project to death with questions about why we don't just modify > "that pesky ol' DFSG" and solve the problem that way. I think "Why are Unmodifiable Sections a Problem?" in the proposed FAQ I just posted in reply to Richard's message covers this. Could you have a look at it to see if you agree? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Description: PGP signature