Re: LPPL, take 2
Scripsit Mark Rafn <email@example.com>
> > Mark Rafn <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > I'm close on this one. "does not identify itself as unmodified in any
> > > way" is harder for me to understand than "identifies itself as modified".
> > It is just a little less restrictive. Instead of requiring people to
> > make a positive action to show that something is modified, they only
> > have to prevent it from showing that it isn't.
> Hmm. I'm not sure it's actually less restrictive. Preventing another
> piece of software (the base format) from making a claim is a lot harder
> than making a positive claim yourself.
But it never said "the modified file must prevent other software from
claiming blah". It said "the modified file must not itself claim blah".
Henning Makholm "We will discuss your youth another time."