[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug: 111609 RFP for cathedral-book; license question



On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 09:26:52PM -0400, Jay Bonci wrote:
> When looking at the RFP for cathedral-book at #111609, the license is
> mentioned as the Open Publication License 2.0.  The only specific
> mention I see of that is at:
> 
> http://opencontent.org/opl.shtml
> and
> http://opencontent.org/openpub
> 
> http://opensource.org/licenses/ doesn't mention anything about this
> either
> 
> These are listed as 1.0 versions.  Is there a version 2 that I am not
> aware of, or are these (somewhat old) DRAFTs considered to be a version
> two of that license?  Or is this just something that I'd have to break
> down and ask ESR for a copy of.
> 
> Please reply-to-all, as I am not on the debian-legal list.
> 
> Thank you,

Heh, I just contacted the original ITP'er (Stephen Stafford) last week
about taking over the ITP, and he said he'd never been able to clarify
the license either.  I emailed Eric Raymond about this directly, but I'm
yet to receive a response.  

Sorry for not keeping the BTS informed, I'll forward Eric's reponse
if/when I get one.

-- 
Rob Weir <rweir@ertius.org>                              http://www.ertius.org/
GPG keys: 1024D/1E73B7CD, 4096R/3ABDE5EC     |      Do I look like I want a CC?
Words of the day:   AUTODIN sniper attack clones BLU-97 A/B analyzer CIDA spies

Attachment: pgp1z2qemmSQI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: