Re: Revised LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)
On Sat, 2003-04-05 at 22:24, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Jeff Licquia <email@example.com> writes:
> > So you do not acknowledge that a particular license might contain
> > elements that are specific to the problem domain?
> I acknowledge it in principle, except it turns out that I don't buy
> the "problem domain" thing. Any bit of code may want to be used in
> any other arbitrarily remote problem domain.
Right, but as I just posted a little bit ago, a restriction to a problem
domain is just one type of specificity. See the GPL, section 2c, for
another, one that I think is appropriate.
Jeff Licquia <firstname.lastname@example.org>