[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: MPL 1.0?

On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 12:01, John Goerzen wrote:

> My understanding, at least with Mozilla, was that it was dual-licensed as
> MPL/GPL because of some problems with the MPL.

Actually, it's tri-licensed as MPL/LGPL/GPL, or at least that's the
goal. http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/ and

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: