Re: Dissident versus ASP
* Jeremy Hankins <firstname.lastname@example.org> [030319 21:21]:
> But at any rate, this isn't a new thing. What you're describing is
> just as much a problem with the GPL.
No. Current GPL allows me the described scenario. Forced distribution
> >> I'm certainly not familiar with German law (I'm not even really
> >> familiar with US law). But does this same liability apply if you
> >> make changes to a CVS repository?
> > IANAL, but as far as I understood it, you are liable for everything
> > you distribute and all all-warenty-excluded statements are null and
> > void like they were not part of anything (At least for distribution
> > from Germans to Germans). While I think German law protects people
> > giving things away for free, they are still liable for damage done
> > willingly or because extreme lack of care. And putting two things
> > together without looking at the parts was ruled extreme lack of
> > care, I heard. So as German one is intrested to do the minimal qa,
> > one would want everyone to do, before distributing anything one
> > created.
> In that case, how can one submit updates to a cvs repository in
You tend to repeat yourself. I'm normaly using "cvs commit" to
Bernhard R. Link
Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing
an editor and a MTA.