[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dual licensed software

On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:31:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Glenn Maynard <g_deb@zewt.org> writes:
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:11:39PM -0500, Luis Bustamante wrote:
> > > QPL is DFSG-free iirc, can JpGraph go in main despite the fact it can
> > > be used also under the terms of JpGraph Commercial License?
> > 
> > The DFSG-freeness of the QPL is currently under renewed debate on this
> > list.
> I think after Henning's recent posts, it's now clear that the QPL is
> not problematic after all, because the forced publication requirement
> can be evaded entirely.

Please review my recent message to this list, subject "QPL clause 3 is
not DFSG-free".

G. Branden Robinson                |    You can have my PGP passphrase when
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    you pry it from my cold, dead
branden@debian.org                 |    brain.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    -- Adam Thornton

Attachment: pgpNDprVJTVAj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: