Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test
Andrea Glorioso <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >>>>> "tb" == Thomas Bushnell <email@example.com> writes:
> tb> They are restrictions which do not preserve any important
> tb> rights of the holder of the software(like the source-provision
> tb> rules of the GPL), and they do not enhance anybody's freedom.
> tb> They are therefore onerous license terms.
> So, your opinion is that the RPSL terms (specifically the terms about
> redistributing modifications, of course) are onerous, too?
Yes, absolutely! That's what started this whole discussion, IIRC.