Re: Another way of thinking of the Chinese dissident test

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Andrea Glorioso <andrea.glorioso@binary-only.com> writes:

> >>>>> "tb" == Thomas Bushnell <tb@becket.net> writes:
> 
>     tb> They are restrictions which do not preserve any important
>     tb> rights of the holder of the software(like the source-provision
>     tb> rules of the GPL), and they do not enhance anybody's freedom.
>     tb> They are therefore onerous license terms.
> 
> So, your opinion is that the RPSL terms (specifically the terms about
> redistributing modifications, of course) are onerous, too?

Yes, absolutely!  That's what started this whole discussion, IIRC.