Re: The Affero license
David Turner <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 00:56, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Specifying a protocol
> > in a license is a horribly bad thing; HTTP isn't useful everywhere,
> > and requiring you to rewrite the program entirely when the protocol
> > becomes obsolete is missing the point of free software pretty thoroughly.
> We know the protocol thing is broken. We hope an intend to fix it.
> Wording suggestions are accepted.
Once again, pipe it to /dev/null. But that seems not to be accepted.