Re: PHPNuke license
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 06:28:06PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:35, John Goerzen wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 05:07:13PM -0500, David Turner wrote:
> > > Distribution does not, and has never, mattered (see previous message in
> > > this thread).
> > I think it's pretty clear that all three subsections of section 2 takes no
> > effect unless distribution has occured.
> Please read it again -- if that's so, why does (2)(b) specifically
> mention distribution?
> (2)(a) and (2)(c) *do* apply even in the absence of distribution.
Well, they try to anyway. If there's no copying taking place, I fail to
see how it can apply, whether it tries to or not.
Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''