Re: Yet another bunch of licences
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 17:38, Richard Stallman wrote:
> These are really important projects that claim to be free in the sense
> of freedom. But I'd like to know, what Free Software Foundation and
> readers of debian-legal think about those licences. So, please, evaluate
> those licences carefully
>
> The Creative Commons licenses are not supposed to be used for software.
> Doesn't the Creative Commons site say so? It ought to.
>
> https://www.helixcommunity.org/
>
> Helix DNA is multi-licenced software project. One of those licences is
> meant to be compatible with Open Source Definition.
>
> The draft I saw was not a free software license. I don't know if they
> have changed it. If you send me a copy I will take a look.
The FSF has been working with the Real people on the license. It's a
slow process, but the dialog is ongoing and productive. They have a
strong interest in making the license into a GPL-compatible Free
Software license.
--
-Dave Turner
GPL Compliance Engineer
Support my work: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=novalis&p=FSF
Reply to: