On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > Clearly the license is non-free due to the requirement that modified > versions not be distributed without the permission of the authors. My > question is this: if I were to obtain permission from the authors for > Debian to distribute packaged binaries of Root, would that be sufficient > for it to go into non-free? Being unable to not fix security issues in a timely manner is a Bad Thing. We should not support, endorse or otherwise support such software. Not even in non-free (which is not part of Debian proper). yours, peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred. | : :' : The universal | `. `' Operating System http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
pgpNtNlqlasHa.pgp
Description: PGP signature