On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 11:46:35AM +0100, Andrea Borgia wrote: > SV>Perhaps Debian just cares more than others about what is allowed by > SV>licenses and what is not. This has happened several times in the > SV>past and should not be a surprise. > I have to take your word for it, because my talks with local Debian > developers and users centered more on the pine-is-crap-use-mutt kind of > logic than on proper legal opinion and examples of similar decisions. I > prefer Pine, so their answer is beside the point and, also, this kind of > reasoning doesn't translate to Debian caring more than others, not by a long > shot. The crappiness of pine is a direct product of our inability to fix it. So it's related to the legal opinion, it just doesn't show. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpZOlTozq7pn.pgp
Description: PGP signature