On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 16:09, Andrew Lau wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:10:28PM +0100, Paolo Ariano wrote: > > > "ImageJ is open-source. You are free to do anything you want with > > this source as long as I get credit for my work and you offer your > > changes to me so I can possibly add them to the "official" version." > > That's way too vague and is no substitue for a license nor does it > explicitly provide him with the protection of a copyright or warranty > indeminity. You really should ask Wayne to license his work under the > BSD license which sounds like what he intended. My IANAL $0.02. IANAL, IANADD. Agree with you, Andrew - but not because it's vague (the condition is stated relatively clearly), but because it's actually quite restrictive; I doubt it's even DFSG-free: the requirement to pass *all* changes to upstream is probably not acceptable. cheers -- vbi -- this email is protected by a digital signature: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg NOTE: keyserver bugs! get my key here: https://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part