Re: EULAs and the DFSG
Glenn Maynard <email@example.com> writes:
> And if they put users through a click-wrap license, but don't require it
> on redistribution, there seems to be no point.
I have trouble figuring out clause 2 in the APSL, specifically point
> (I've seen some slightly confused Windows installers for GPL
> programs with a click-through containing the GPL. No real harm in
> that, I think, but it's unnecessary.)
I personally think that that harms (if ever so slightly) the image of
the GLP as being "more free than copyright".