[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: license questions.

On 2002-10-07 12:47:51 -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Ali Akcaagac <ali.akcaagac@stud.fh-wilhelmshaven.de> wrote:
> > it's your definition isn't it ? 
> No.  Read www.opensource.org's definition at point 3:

Which is the definition of a body calling itself "Open Source

"Open source" at first means just that: You can have the source.

Interestingly the LPPL currently is not OSI certified. Does it
follow that LaTeX is closed source?

Best regards

Reply to: