[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: license questions.

On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:15:07PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Another example is that RMS considers the original (unclarified)
> Artistic License too ambiguous to be free, while we list it as an
> example of a DFSG-free licence.

I wish we could back away from that.  RMS is dead right on that point.

G. Branden Robinson                |       Convictions are more dangerous
Debian GNU/Linux                   |       enemies of truth than lies.
branden@debian.org                 |       -- Friedrich Nietzsche
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpI7WGzDQ5M5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: