Re: Bad license on VCG?
This is a public discussion, and I'm not interested in having it in
(as such, replies to other portions omitted)
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:36:24PM +1200, Nick Phillips wrote:
> It's moot really, as we almost certainly don't *want* to distribute it as
> 'free' anyway.
I think the real question was whether it can be distributed at all
Whether it can or not, I would prefer it not be; I share Jeff's view
that behavior such as this is deceptive.