Re: TeX Licenses & teTeX (Was: Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia)
> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:16:08 -0500
> From: Branden Robinson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Are you asking Debian to regard the following license as DFSG-free?
> Copyright 1996-2002 Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
> files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
> restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
> copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
> sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
> Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
> 1) The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall
> be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
> 2) No file called "plain.tex" shall ever exist on a system where
> a TeX interpreter could possibly locate it.
I think that your condition (2) is different from the usual
understanding of Knuth's intentions. Again, I cannot vouch for DEK,
but *my* understanding is
2) No file called "plain.tex" can be distributed together with
the TeX interpreter in such a manner that TeX interpreter can
possibly locate it unless at least one of the following two
conditions is satisfied: (a) this is the exactly unchanged
copy of the Knuthian one, or (b) the interpreter is not
called TeX, and is not distributed as such
Blessed is he who expects no gratitude, for he shall not be disappointed.
-- W.C. Bennett