Re: MP3 decoders' non-freeness
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 16:12, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > There most certainly are patents on mp3. I won't comment on enforceability
> > or relevance. Regardless, the burden of proof is on the violator
> > of the patents, as they have already been granted.
> > http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/index.html
> Do these patents also apply to programs (like libmap for example) that
> have been written from scratch, just using the ISO/IEC standards?
Yes. That's the point of patents: they are more restrictive than
copyrights because they cover the process, not the implementation.
Joe Drew <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
"This particular group of cats is mostly self-herding." -- Bdale Garbee
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com