[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: MP3 decoders' non-freeness



On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 02:49:51PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> A long while ago Adrian Bunk filed bugs such as #65797 saying that MP3
> decoders, in addition to encoders, were patented. Discussion at that
> time went along the lines of "Prove it," and nothing ever happened. No
> mp3 decoder was ever moved to non-free, to the best of my knowledge. 
> 
> Has there been any resolution of this issue? Is it safe to close these
> bugs? 

There most certainly are patents on mp3. I won't comment on enforceability
or relevance. Regardless, the burden of proof is on the violator
of the patents, as they have already been granted.

http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/index.html

-drew

-- 
M. Drew Streib <dtype@dtype.org>
Independent Rambler, Software/Standards/Freedom/Law -- http://dtype.org/

Attachment: pgpGrv7cqdJcS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: