[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

AW: A few more LPPL concerns



If that's the feeling and attitude of the majority of the people here then
the whole exercise
is pointless. I hope this is a singular incidence. If not please tell us so
and we might as well stop 
the discussion

regards
frank

-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: tb@becket.net [mailto:tb@becket.net]
Gesendet: Montag, 22. Juli 2002 11:29
An: Nick Phillips
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: A few more LPPL concerns


Nick Phillips <nwp@nz.lemon-computing.com> writes:

> As I pointed out, good practise alone would suggest that the University
> didn't call their hacked version "LaTeX" in the latter case. But where
> is the line to be drawn, if it is to be drawn at all?

I think that ultimately it is the University and its users who are
best place to make that decision, and not the LaTeX mafia.

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: