Re: Hypothetical LaTeX security holes

To: Boris Veytsman <borisv@lk.net>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Hypothetical LaTeX security holes
From: Brian Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:59:21 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] jvpbs96ufjq.fsf@woodcarver.kendall.akamai.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200207172034.g6HKY0AM010148@bilbo.localnet> (Boris Veytsman's message of "Wed, 17 Jul 2002 16:34:00 -0400")
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0207171157410.16464-100000@deepone.dagon.net> <[🔎] 200207172001.g6HK1XWU009815@bilbo.localnet> <[🔎] 1026937585.1999.3.camel@laptop2.internal.licquia.org> <[🔎] 200207172034.g6HKY0AM010148@bilbo.localnet>

As we're finding out with the US DMCA, permission to distribute a
modified file does not include permission to modify a file.  This also
appears to be missing from the LPPL draft presented here.

-Brian

-- 
Brian Sniffen
bts@alum.mit.edu

Attachment: pgpeW9QgUTX4B.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Hypothetical LaTeX security holes
  - From: Mark Rafn <dagon@dagon.net>
- Re: Hypothetical LaTeX security holes
  - From: Boris Veytsman <borisv@lk.net>
- Re: Hypothetical LaTeX security holes
  - From: Jeff Licquia <licquia@debian.org>
- Re: Hypothetical LaTeX security holes
  - From: Boris Veytsman <borisv@lk.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Copyright infringement of the Debian logo by www.elektrostore.se
Next by Date: Re: User's thoughts about LPPL
Previous by thread: Re: Hypothetical LaTeX security holes
Next by thread: Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread