Re: GNU FDL 1.2 draft comment summary posted, and RFD

[Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>]

Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:

> My initial strategy is going to be to start from a simple base, like the
> OPL without its optional clauses, and add concepts from the GNU GPL, and
> the published GNU FDL draft.  My main goals are:
[...]
> * to appeal to people who are already using the OPL or GNU FDL
>   (especially the latter)

Isn't it mostly the FSF that's using the GNU FDL right now?  I
think it's going to be difficult to talk the FSF into adopting
someone else's license.
-- 
"In this world that Hugh Heffner had made,
 he alone seemed forever bunnyless."
--John D. MacDonald


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org