Re: CUPS, the GNU GPL, and dual-licensing
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 14:20, Michael Sweet wrote:
> OK, for the purposes of clarification, how does the following
> additional sentence sound:
> No developer is required to provide these exceptions in a
> derived work.
> I've put the ammended license agreement up on the CUPS server
> for your complete review:
As far as I can tell, this seems to meet all concerns. The placement is
key, I think. (The sentence applies to all of the GPL exceptions, not
just the Apple one.)
But, I'm probably biased. :-) Hopefully, someone else will chime in.
Thanks for working with us on this, BTW. Not all upstream authors are
this easy to work with.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com