Re: libreadline

To: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
Cc: gregor@hoffleit.de, bam@snoopy.apana.org.au, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, doko@debian.org
Subject: Re: libreadline
From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 06 May 2002 23:31:32 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87r8kocvuj.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020506.203341.71085988.wlandry@ucsd.edu>
References: <1020485274.22862.48.camel@scrooge> <[🔎] 20020504174059.GA3582@hal.mediasupervision.de> <[🔎] 20020506.203341.71085988.wlandry@ucsd.edu>

Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu> writes:

> There might be a problem if you distribute them together.  To allay
> any concerns, I would recommend splitting python into 2 packages.

I agree.  I would suggest asking the FSF what they think.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: libreadline
  - From: Gregor Hoffleit <gregor@hoffleit.de>
- Re: libreadline
  - From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: libreadline
Next by Date: Re: libreadline
Previous by thread: Re: libreadline
Next by thread: Re: a52dec - shared version
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread