[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



xmotd package currently is in main. This is mostly OK, since it seems to be
GPL-ed. (The top source directory contains file "GNU" which contains GPLv2).

However the source contains a HTML rendering widget source code, which seems to
be very non-free. For example:

 * The UI grants you (hereafter, Licensee) a license to use the Software    *
 * for academic, research and internal business purposes only, without a    *
 * fee.  Licensee may distribute the binary and source code (if released)   *
 * to third parties provided that the copyright notice and this statement   *
 * appears on all copies and that no charge is associated with such         *
 * copies.                                                                  *

The above violates the "Free Redistribution" part of DFSG.
The previous maintainer wrote in changelog:

  * "New" upstream version. It's not built with HTML support because
    that part of the code is non-free.

Is this sufficient? Shouldn't the whole package be moved to non-free?
And if it was in non-free, would it be OK to build it with HTML support?


Marcin Owsiany <porridge@debian.org>             http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216  FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75  D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216

Attachment: pgpMez9Bz0ZhY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: