Re: could you safely rewrite the DFSG requirement?
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 09:34:15AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But, i will make a proposal for the DFSG to be ammended so as to remove the
> > aggregation clause, or at least clearly state that we consider a null or
> > almost null aggregation ok.
> It would have to be the other way around; to state that even trivial
> aggregations MUST be allowed by the license. Nitpicking a license, only
> to leave ourselves unable to distribute part of our own 'approved'
> archive, is no win. :)
> But I definitely agree with you that some action needs to be taken on
> the documentation-as-software question.
Thanks for your comment, after having reread it i understand that now.
The best wording would somewhat of the kind :
can be distributed ... either as an aggregation or standalone ...
Or something such.
This does not solve the documentation (and printed books) as software problem