On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:15:39PM +0100, Sven wrote: > Is the FDL (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.2-draft.txt) altough in draft > form, a licence recognized free by debian ? Is it a good choice of licences > for documentation ? What are the other alternatives ? > > BTW, the FDL seems to impose some rather drastic requirement on printing and > other such, so i have my doubt about its freeness, but i did not read it as > deeply as i should maybe, but it is the FSF ... As far as I can tell, the FDL -- both in its current official and draft forms -- is unambiguously DFSG-free if the document licensed under it contains no Cover Texts or Invariant Sections. -- G. Branden Robinson | There's nothing an agnostic can't Debian GNU/Linux | do if he doesn't know whether he branden@debian.org | believes in it or not. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Graham Chapman
Attachment:
pgp9hFN3NlQOy.pgp
Description: PGP signature