Re: could you safely rewrite the DFSG requirement?
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Sven wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:36:11AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Sven <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > People generally seem happy with the idea that the DFSG applies
> > directly to documentation, mutatis mutandis, exactly as it does to
> > software.
> Yes, but it is not written as such. And about people that seem happy with it,
> most probably, they either don't know or don't care.
It was discussed on this list in the past; look at
and follow-ups. I haven't been able to find a definite agreement though;
perhaps I haven't looked hard enough.
Martin Orr "Cogitavi ergo fui."
Methodist College Belfast
The opinions expressed in this e-mail are mine personally, and should not be
interpreted as representing those of the College or the CCC unless
explicitly stated otherwise.