On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:15:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Branden Robinson <email@example.com> writes: > > > How isn't it? The above statement in writing is no different in meaning > > or intent from saying "no thanks" when the person handing you a binary > > of GCC also offers you the source code. It's just a lot more > > formalized. > > Courts are more than able to distinguish between: > > John offers Peter something, and Peter says "no thanks". > > John pretends to offer Peter something, and Peter has to say "no thanks", > or else John won't do some nice thing for Peter. They are? Maybe I took the outcome of the *first* Microsoft antitrust trial too seriously, then. :-P -- G. Branden Robinson | Psychology is really biology. Debian GNU/Linux | Biology is really chemistry. firstname.lastname@example.org | Chemistry is really physics. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | Physics is really math.
Description: PGP signature