Re: three send back changes clauses
Walter Landry <landry@physics.utah.edu> writes:
> It seems like you're interpreting the weasel words to make the whole
> clause have no practical effect. I don't think that we can really do
> that. You're saying that if my boss tells me not to contribute back
> changes, that is enough to foil "best effort". What if it is my wife?
> What about the voices I hear in my head? I still think that the
> package can't go in main.
I think (IIRC) that we've distributed older MIT Scheme releases, which
have just those terms.
It's fine to put arbitrary "please" requests into the license; if the
request cannot be enforced, then it doesn't violate the DFSG.
Reply to: