Re: lame (again!)
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:14:22PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Viral <viral@debian.org> writes:
>
> > I would like clarify the reason for lame not being included in the debian
> > archives, not even non-US.
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
>
> IIRC your questions are addressed there.
>
Lame is already included in the Debian archives in libmp3lame_audioenc.so.0
in libavifile in debian/main. It's in shared library form, but appears to be
a fully functional mpeg-1 layer 3 encoder and not just a wrapper that
invokes a lame binary the user already has on their system.
--
Brian Ristuccia
brian@ristuccia.com
bristucc@cs.uml.edu
Reply to: