Re: lame (again!)
Brian Ristuccia <brian@ristuccia.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:14:22PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > >> Viral <viral@debian.org> writes:
> >
> > > I would like clarify the reason for lame not being included in the debian
> > > archives, not even non-US.
> >
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
> >
> > IIRC your questions are addressed there.
> >
>
> Lame is already included in the Debian archives in libmp3lame_audioenc.so.0
> in libavifile in debian/main. It's in shared library form, but appears to be
> a fully functional mpeg-1 layer 3 encoder and not just a wrapper that
> invokes a lame binary the user already has on their system.
That's a bug then... (which I've just filed).
--
James
Reply to: