Re: [summary] Interpretive Guideline regarding DFSG clause 3
Oohara Yuuma <email@example.com> wrote:
> I am interested in this thread because many of the Newbiedoc documents
> are licensed under GNU FDL. I wrote a summary of the thread.
> Please correct me if I am wrong.
> * Everyone on this thread agreed that works licensed under GNU FDL
> with no Invariant Sections are completely DFSG free.
> * Everyone on this thread agreed that copyright notices may be invariant.
> * Almost everyone on this thread wanted to have the emacs manual and
> the gdb manual (both have invariant texts) in main.
I would say that, yes, basically everyone would like to have the emacs
manual and the gdb manual in main. However, there are a significant
number of people (though probably not a majority) who aren't happy
with it going in the way it is (with the invariant sections).
With that caveat, I would say that this is an excellent summary of the