[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: wpoison, is it okay?

"Sunnanvind" <sunnanvind@fenderson.com> writes:

> Re-read. It says "image should be inside the hyperlink", not the other 
> way around.

You're right, but it still seems to prohibit any kind of distribution
which is not by hyperlinks that include their logo.  That's not
trademark protection, it's rather a kind of forced advertising.
Unlike the noxious BSD advertising clause, however, it actually
requires the advertising, and as such, is non-free.

It seems to me that we cannot even distribute it in the nonfree

Reply to: