Re: Fwd: Bug#120759: jove doesn't seem to have an free license.
Sam Hartman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> A DFSG-free package must allow modification and must say so in its
> license. I'm not sure I share the opinion about what you should do
> about the problem.
As Steve Greenland says the only thing that solves the problem is
effectively a relicensing. You could get the author to tweak the
existing license to allow modification or just get him to use a
license that everybody knows.
The reason to suggest the 2-clause BSD-license over other licenses is
that it is the closest to the existitng license.
Når folk spørger mig, om jeg er nørd, bliver jeg altid ilde til mode
og svarer lidt undskyldende: "Nej, jeg bruger RedHat".
-- Allan Olesen på dk.edb.system.unix