On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:45:54PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > I'm inclined to say that we need explicit permission to modify and to > > distribute modified versions. Apart from that, though, what do you think > > about the last clause? Is it equivalent to "... must reproduce the above > > copyright notice ... in the documentation and/or other materials > > provided with the distribution" clause in the modern BSD licence, or is > > it equivalent to the old BSD advertising clause? [...] > When you talk to him, consider having him use the bsd with advert. Gives him > what he wants plus the legal indemnity clause. No, he doesn't need the advertising clause for that. He said "must reproduce the copyright notice in documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution". 3-clause BSD, or the MIT license, is probably ideal. -- G. Branden Robinson | One man's "magic" is another man's Debian GNU/Linux | engineering. "Supernatural" is a branden@debian.org | null word. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
Attachment:
pgpGcx8jSanNq.pgp
Description: PGP signature