Re: [Steve Lidie <Stephen.O.Lidie@Lehigh.EDU>] Re: xodometer licensing
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
>John Galt <email@example.com>:
>> >Well, I don't think it's a free license for similar reasons as RMS.
>> >Mostly because it's very vauge in places, and references things that
>> >it really shouldn't in others. Examples:
>> I doubt it. RMS's REAL reason is that it isn't his GPL. Look at how many
>> unequivocally free licenses fall under his definition of non-free. Hell
>> the most free license in existence, the original BSD "do whatever you
>> want, just don't bother us or plagiarize" license was considered by RMS to
>> be non-free.
About the time that Debian was still part of the FSF...
For every problem there is one solution which is simple, neat, and wrong.
-- H. L. Mencken
John Galt (firstname.lastname@example.org)