Re: [Steve Lidie <Stephen.O.Lidie@Lehigh.EDU>] Re: xodometer licensing
John Galt <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> >Well, I don't think it's a free license for similar reasons as RMS.
> >Mostly because it's very vauge in places, and references things that
> >it really shouldn't in others. Examples:
> I doubt it. RMS's REAL reason is that it isn't his GPL. Look at how many
> unequivocally free licenses fall under his definition of non-free. Hell
> the most free license in existence, the original BSD "do whatever you
> want, just don't bother us or plagiarize" license was considered by RMS to
> be non-free.