Re: Source code with no (explicit) licence

To: Brian Ristuccia <brian@ristuccia.com>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Source code with no (explicit) licence
From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 14:30:37 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 971720828.25cf3442@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20001016141721.J10853@osiris.978.org>; from brian@ristuccia.com on Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:17:21PM -0400
References: <[🔎] 20001016014941.C32184@linuxmafia.com> <[🔎] 20001016051941.B29503@debian.org> <[🔎] 20001016141721.J10853@osiris.978.org>

On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:17:21PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> Can anyone name a good replacement that can do Maildir delivery and doesn't
> run tons of stuff as root? 

Any MTA which supports procmail can do Maildir delivery.

Postfix has an architecture vaguely reminiscent of qmail, and can
do maildir delivery without procmail.

-- 
Raul

Reply to:

References:
- Source code with no (explicit) licence
  - From: Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com>
- Re: Source code with no (explicit) licence
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>
- Re: Source code with no (explicit) licence
  - From: Brian Ristuccia <brian@ristuccia.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Source code with no (explicit) licence
Next by Date: Re: Source code with no (explicit) licence
Previous by thread: Re: Source code with no (explicit) licence
Next by thread: Re: Source code with no (explicit) licence
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread