Re: Source code with no (explicit) licence
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:49:41AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> My gut feeling is that a non-licence remains no licence -- and that, if
> it were ever proposed for Debian (which it hasn't been), it would end up
> in non-free following the "err on the side of caution" principle.
Your gut feeling is wrong. Without a license, the program cannot be
distributed at all. DJB knows this. He likes it that way, apparently.
--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
<Knghtbrd> If we're both right (I'm guessing we are) I'm Not Very Happy.
* Minupla hands you the understatement of the year award.
Reply to: