Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]

To: Brian Ristuccia <brian@ristuccia.com>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 21:09:21 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000619210921.A8622@priv3.onet.pl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000619124350.T15109@osiris.978.org>; from brian@ristuccia.com on Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 12:43:50PM -0400
References: <[🔎] 20000617125155.A1494@debian.org> <[🔎] 20000617135218.O15109@osiris.978.org> <[🔎] 20000618211944.Y32679@zork.net> <[🔎] 20000619122759.A643@priv3.onet.pl> <[🔎] 20000619124350.T15109@osiris.978.org>

On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 12:43:50PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 12:27:59PM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> > 
> > Has anything changed about MNGs in last 3 months ???
> > 
> 
> Support for mng was added to a recent build of mozilla within the past month
> or so. 

Full support or just MNG-LC / MNG-VLC ???

Reply to:

References:
- [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
  - From: Brian Almeida <bma@debian.org>
- Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
  - From: Brian Ristuccia <brian@ristuccia.com>
- Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
  - From: Nick Moffitt <nick@zork.net>
- Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
  - From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski <maniek@beer.com>
- Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
  - From: Brian Ristuccia <brian@ristuccia.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [OT] What does 'General Public License' mean?
Next by Date: Re: New Apache license compatible with GPL? (Was: [Talin@ACM.org: Suggestions for wording...?])
Previous by thread: Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Next by thread: Re: [bunk@fs.tum.de: Bug#65794: freeamp must go to non-free]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread