Re: orphaning fetchmail
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 08:04:15PM +0100, Christian Surchi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 06:51:13PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> [Discussing the future of fetchmail and SSL-enabled versions, there
> are two possibilities:]
>
> > (1) Have an SSL-disabled version in main and an SSL-enabled version in
> > non-us/main
> >
> > (2) Only have one version, SSL-enabled, in non-us/main.
>
> fetchmail is licensed under GPL license. What about conflict between GPL
> and BSD clauses from openssl? I mean the problem with mutt and ssl. What
> about lynx-ssl, links-ssl, fetchmail-ssl and others?
I know nothing about this issue. Copying to -legal (and trimming Cc:
list).
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: