Re: New license for UW-IMAP
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 02:41:54PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
> So is mozilla in main or non-free?
You should be able to figure that out.
Anyways, currently there's two licenses here:
http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/
http://www.mozilla.org/NPL/NPL-1.0.html
> If imap goes into non-free because of this one clause, it'd be logical
> to reassess mozilla in light of it.
Feel free to look into this yourself. Personally, I think you've confused
mozilla and netscape.
> BTW Raul, which clause of the DFSG is violated in this case?
Beats me.
I have a recollection of there being some interaction between some of the
terms of the mozilla license and the required assignment of copyright
to Netscape, that was a problem. I might be remembering wrong, or that
might have been an earlier version of the license.
I've not looked very closely at the current NPL, but I don't see any
problem with it at the moment.
--
Raul
Reply to: