Re: license interpretation

To: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu>
Cc: Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz@emyr.net>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: license interpretation
From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 07:00:06 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 970657113.c6e1152d@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0010040149030.27335-100000@inconnu.isu.edu>; from galt@inconnu.isu.edu on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:56:09AM -0600
References: <[🔎] 20001003104955.A30444@tolkien.emyr.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0010040149030.27335-100000@inconnu.isu.edu>

On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:56:09AM -0600, John Galt incorrectly wrote:
> It's the classic BSD advertising clause, ...

The quoted clauses do not even mention advertising.

-- 
Raul

Reply to:

References:
- license interpretation
  - From: lfilipoz@emyr.net (Luca Filipozzi)
- Re: license interpretation
  - From: John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: license interpretation
Next by Date: Re: ITP: PIPS (Photo Image Print System for Linux)
Previous by thread: Re: license interpretation
Next by thread: Re: ITP: PIPS (Photo Image Print System for Linux)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread